Agent Assist vs. Autonomous Agents

Agent assist systems help people act faster and with fewer errors. Autonomous agents plan and execute multi-step tasks with tool access. Pick the right model for the risk and the work: assistance by default, autonomy by exception, and guardrails either way.

Overview

In production, most value comes from agent assist: classify, extract, summarize, recommend, and draft with a person in control. Autonomous agents add planning and tool use to take actions. Because LLMs are probabilistic, autonomy requires strict boundaries: limited tools, explicit approvals, logging, and a fast rollback path.

Definitions

Agent assist

  • LLM produces recommendations, summaries, extractions, or drafts
  • Human approves/edits before actions affect systems or customers
  • Great fit for service desks, quality checks, case notes, email drafts

Autonomous agent

  • LLM plans tasks, calls tools/APIs, and executes steps
  • Policy and approvals gate high-impact actions
  • Good fit for repetitive, bounded operations with clear outcomes

When autonomy fails

  • Ambiguous goals; sparse or volatile data
  • Open-ended browsing or tools without guardrails
  • No owner, no kill switch, no audit trail

Decision framework

Impact

  • Customer-visible? Financial or safety risk? → keep assist or require approval
  • Back-office, reversible steps → autonomy possible with limits

Clarity

  • Stable goal and termination conditions
  • Deterministic tools with validation
  • Grounded context (RAG from approved sources)

Control

  • Policy and RBAC in front of tools
  • Approvals for thresholds; immutable logs
  • Kill switch and rollback

Architecture patterns

Assist patterns

  • Suggest-and-approve: LLM proposes; user edits/approves; system executes
  • Summarize-and-cite: RAG with citations; blocked without sources
  • Extract-and-validate: structured JSON with schema checks

Autonomy patterns

  • Plan-and-execute: planner decomposes task; executor calls tools
  • Toolformer-style calls: LLM emits function calls; platform enforces allowlists/quotas
  • Supervisor agent: meta-agent gates high-risk steps and seeks approval

State & memory

  • Short-term memory per task; avoid long-term user data unless policy allows
  • Log prompts, tool calls, results, approvals, overrides
  • Do not write back to ground truth without validation

Tools & permissions

Tool model

  • Allowlisted tools with typed schemas and explicit scopes
  • Quotas, rate limits, and dry-run for risky operations
  • Test doubles for non-prod; canary releases in prod

Data boundaries

  • RAG only from approved corpora; redact PII/secret data
  • Context access = user’s access; propagate RBAC/OIDC claims

Guardrails & policy

Policy

Document allowed use cases, prohibited inputs, escalation paths, and human oversight rules.

Filters

Input/output filters (PII, secrets, toxicity); JSON schema validation; jailbreak detection.

Approvals

Threshold-based gates for money, access changes, or customer contact; signatures stored with rationale.

Human-in-the-loop

Design

  • Confidence × impact grid for auto vs. review
  • Explain sources; show diffs; one-click edits
  • Collect feedback to retrain prompts/models

Approval UX

  • Summaries with citations and blocked red flags
  • Clear “why” for recommendations and actions

Evaluation & monitoring

Offline

  • Task accuracy, groundedness/faithfulness
  • Adversarial prompts; tool misuse tests

Online

  • Override rate, approval latency, safety flags
  • Tool error rates, API timeouts, retries

Drift & regression

  • Golden sets after model/prompt/data changes
  • Canary/ring deploys; rollback plan

Operations, cost & SRE

Run rules

  • SLIs/SLOs (latency, success, hallucination flags)
  • Rate limits, quotas, token budgets per team
  • Playbooks for timeouts, degraded modes, kill switch

Costs

  • Token/compute cost, embedding/caching, vector store I/O
  • Human review time; retraining cycles

90-day starter

Days 0–30

  • Pick one assist use case (classify/route or summarize)
  • Publish policy; define tools and scopes
  • Set approval thresholds and logging

Days 31–60

  • Add RAG from approved sources; schema-check outputs
  • Instrument override rate and safety flags
  • Trial a single autonomous action behind approval

Days 61–90

  • Canary rollout; track value and risk deltas
  • Decide assist-only vs. limited autonomy; finalize SLOs

References

Assist by default. Autonomy by exception. Guardrails always.

If you want a guardrails checklist and an agent tool-scope template, ask for a copy.

Contact us